자기 학생의 조작 발견후 미국교수의 대처2

후속 연구 진행자에게 재계약 불가 통보, 추천서 불가 통보, 책임전가.

1. Last Fall, the PI detected something that could be regarded as data fabrication/falsification in one of his papers. He had no intentional activities regarding research misconduct.. However the first author failed to clarify the origin of the published data on several requests that continued over 10 months. She conceded the incorrectness of the information presented in the published paper and attempted to justify it, after the PI started examining all relevant datasets and information. I bet she was intentional. She graduated.

2. Last Fall, the PI detected the allegation of data fabrication/falsification. And he referred to this paper in a new manuscript in January. And as a student raised concerns about fairness to him, he reported the matter along with the allegation of data fabrication/falsification to related offices. 전학생을 끝까지 보호하는 반면, 후속연구 진행자를 범법자 취급.

3. The PI listed the name of a person who had never contributed to the study in the authorlist as the 2nd author and he pushed that person to contribute to the study afterward. 전학생처럼 조작할까봐 감시용으로 추가.

조금만 기다려보고 그 조작 논문, 리포트해야겠습니다.